Brussels Accused of Scheming to ‘LEGALISE’ Irregular Migration as Sir Keir Starmer Endeavours to Foster Closer Relations with European Union
In a startling turn of events following the Labour Party’s ascension to power in July, the newly appointed British Foreign Secretary, the Right Honourable David Lammy MP, made a striking announcement that has sent ripples through the political landscape. Lammy, in a bold and unanticipated move, proclaimed a comprehensive “reset” of the United Kingdom’s intricate and often tumultuous relationship with the European Union.
This proclamation was swiftly echoed and reinforced by none other than the Prime Minister himself, the Right Honourable Sir Keir Starmer KC MP, during a press briefing at the recent NATO Summit. In a statement that has since been scrutinised and debated in political circles across the nation, Sir Keir expressed his fervent hope to recalibrate and reinvigorate Britain’s multifaceted relations with the EU. This ambitious reset, he elaborated, would encompass a wide array of critical issues, ranging from the contentious topic of migration to matters of national and international security, and even extending to the intricate realm of agricultural trade.
Speaking with measured enthusiasm at the aforementioned press briefing, Sir Keir expounded on his vision: “What we’re discussing here is nothing short of a fundamental reset of our relations with our European counterparts. I believe that for a great many people in our nation, there has been a pervasive sense in the post-Brexit era that the United Kingdom has become excessively inward-looking, almost isolationist in its stance. This is a perception we must address and rectify with utmost urgency.”
On the particularly thorny issue of migration, which has long been a source of heated debate and political discord, Sir Keir has delineated a nuanced and multifaceted approach to tackling irregular migration. Central to this strategy is a concerted effort to clamp down on the nefarious people-smuggling gangs that operate in the shadows, orchestrating and profiting from the perilous journeys of desperate individuals.
The Labour Party’s manifesto, a document that has been pored over and analysed by political commentators and citizens alike, outlines an ambitious plan to establish a new Border Security Command. This specialised unit would comprise hundreds of highly trained and experienced professionals, including specialist investigators, cross-border police officers, and intelligence operatives. The primary objective of this new command would be to bolster the nation’s border security and disrupt the operations of criminal networks involved in people smuggling.
In a move that has raised eyebrows and sparked debate, the government has announced its intention to reallocate funds that were previously earmarked for the now-scrapped Rwanda policy. These substantial financial resources will instead be channelled towards a more proactive and targeted approach, with the stated aim to “pursue, disrupt, and apprehend those responsible for the vile trade in human lives.” This shift in policy and resource allocation represents a significant departure from the previous administration’s approach to tackling irregular migration.
During the NATO Summit, Sir Keir made another significant announcement that underscores his government’s commitment to addressing the root causes of irregular migration. He revealed plans to allocate a substantial sum of 84 million pounds to initiatives in Africa and the Middle East. This financial commitment is intended to address the underlying factors that drive individuals to embark on perilous journeys in search of a better life, often falling prey to unscrupulous smugglers in the process.
The Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, has been particularly active in his efforts to rebuild and strengthen the UK’s relationship with the European Union. Following a series of high-profile diplomatic visits to Germany, Poland, and Sweden, Lammy emphasised that these initial talks were “merely the beginning” of Labour’s concerted efforts to mend and reinvigorate the UK’s relationship with the bloc.
In a speech that resonated with many and sparked debate among others, Lammy eloquently stated: “Throughout the annals of history, our individual and national narratives have intertwined to weave a broader tapestry of shared progress and mutual understanding. In the present day, we stand united in our unwavering commitment to the principles of democracy, human rights, and the rule of international law.”
He continued, his words carrying the weight of historical perspective: “The tragic experiences that have marred our continent’s shared past have served as a poignant reminder of how our collective security and prosperity are inextricably linked to these shared values. It is my firm belief that these very values offer a solid foundation upon which we can build an even closer partnership in the years to come.”
Lammy concluded his remarks with a forward-looking statement that has been widely interpreted as a signal of the Labour government’s long-term foreign policy objectives: “My diplomatic engagements this weekend represent merely the initial steps on a long journey. I eagerly anticipate witnessing Britain’s gradual but steady reconnection with our European neighbours in the years that lie ahead. This process of rebuilding trust and fostering cooperation will undoubtedly be a marathon rather than a sprint, but it is a journey we must undertake for the benefit of future generations.”
As the Labour Government continues to strengthen its ties with the European Union, questions have inevitably arisen regarding the potential European migration schemes that the UK might be brought into. These questions have sparked intense debate and speculation across the political spectrum and among the general public.
Critics of the government’s approach have been quick to voice their concerns. One outspoken opponent of closer EU ties stated: “It’s becoming increasingly clear that Sir Keir Starmer intends to sign our nation up to the EU’s resettlement programme for irregular migrants. This programme is Brussels’ ill-conceived answer to its own misguided open border policy, which has created numerous challenges across the continent.”
The critic continued, their words tinged with palpable frustration: “Instead of taking decisive action to secure Europe’s borders, irregular migrants will be distributed in quotas to countries across the EU. In essence, Brussels is attempting to legalise irregular migration through the back door, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for our nation and others.”
For those unfamiliar with the intricacies of EU policy, the resettlement scheme in question is defined by the European Commission as “the admission of non-EU nationals in need of international protection from a non-EU country to which they have been displaced to an EU country where they are granted protection.” This definition, while seemingly straightforward, belies the complex political and social implications of such a programme.
Under the recently announced 2024-2025 EU Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission scheme, a total of 14 EU member states have made commitments to resettle an aggregate of 61,000 individuals. This figure has been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate, with proponents arguing that it represents a compassionate response to global displacement, while critics contend that it could strain social services and integration efforts in participating countries.
It’s worth noting that this is not the first time the UK has grappled with the question of participation in EU resettlement schemes. Cast your mind back to 2015, when the then Home Secretary, the Right Honourable Theresa May MP, took a firm stance against British participation in such programmes. May argued vehemently that people should not be incentivised to undertake perilous journeys to Europe, asserting that “this is precisely why the UK will not participate in a mandatory system of resettlement or relocation.” This historical context adds another layer of complexity to the current debate surrounding potential UK involvement in EU migration schemes.
However, it’s crucial to note that Sir Keir Starmer has recently made efforts to clarify his government’s position on this matter. Speaking at the European Political Community summit last week, he categorically ruled out the possibility of a returns agreement with the EU. In no uncertain terms, he stated: “Regarding a returns agreement, I have consistently maintained that we will not be part of the EU scheme. That particular programme is designed for and limited to EU members. We are no longer an EU member state. We have never expressed a desire, made a request, or sought to be part of that scheme, and I can assure you that we have no intention of becoming part of that scheme in the future.”
As this complex situation continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of migration and the UK’s relationship with the European Union will remain at the forefront of political discourse for the foreseeable future. The Labour government’s efforts to reset relations with the EU while maintaining a distinct approach to migration policy will undoubtedly be watched closely by supporters and critics alike. As always, only time will tell how these policies will shape the future of the United Kingdom and its place in the broader European context.
Ursula von der Leyen told she should go to ‘prison’ by MEP in rant ahead of key vote
Ursula von der Leyen was confirmed for a second term as European Commission President today – after a lively debate in the European parliament
Ursula von der Leyen was heavily criticised for her immigration and green policies by a representative of the newest far-right group in the European Parliament.
Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, a Polish MEP part of the Eurosceptic and hard right Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) group, lashed out at Ms Von der Leyen hours before members of the European Parliament held a vote on whether the incumbent European Commission President should retain her role for another term.
After taking the floor, Ms Zajączkowska-Hernik described the first election as president of Ms Von der Leyen as a “huge mistake” before hitting out in an astonishing rant at some of the German politician’s signature policies.
She claimed: “You are the face of the European Green Deal, which is destroying the European economy and agriculture, which is leading to Europe becoming an economic backwater.