Skip to content

Vote for Antony Antoniou

Antony Antoniou – Reform UK Northampton North
Prospective Parliamentary Candidate
(PPC) 2024 General Election

reform-rosette

The Implications of the EU Scientific Research Program Horizon

The UK’s Return to the EU Scientific Research Program Horizon: What You Need to Know

Introduction:

In a recent development, the United Kingdom is set to rejoin the European Union’s scientific research program, Horizon. This move comes with a discounted membership fee, representing an agreement reached after extensive negotiations. Initially, the UK agreed to a £15 billion membership fee as part of the post-Brexit trade and cooperation deal. However, tensions surrounding the Northern Ireland protocol led to the European Commission’s rejection of this deal. Nevertheless, Brussels has now agreed not to charge Britain for the years it was locked out of the scheme during the negotiations.

Many believe that this return to Horizon could be a boon for British scientists, as they gain access to a substantial £18 billion pool for grant applications. But what does this agreement entail, and what are the underlying details? In this blog post, we’ll explore the UK’s reentry into the Horizon program and dissect the implications.

The Horizon Europe Program:

Horizon Europe is an ambitious scientific collaboration program across Europe, aimed at fostering research and innovation for the benefit of all participating nations. On the surface, it appears to be a mutually beneficial endeavor. However, delving into the fine print reveals a different story.

The Fine Print:

Horizon Europe’s fundamental aim, as stated prominently on its website, is the promotion of EU policies that align with the European Union’s interests. In essence, the EU Commission determines what research projects align with their agenda and the EU’s priorities. This means that the UK, in rejoining Horizon, will contribute £2.6 billion annually from taxpayers’ money to the program. Subsequently, the EU will decide which British scientific projects comply with its interests and may return the funds accordingly. In essence, the UK is funding research that primarily serves EU interests.

The European Defence Fund:

Notably, two weeks before signing the trade and cooperation agreement, the European Defense Fund was integrated into Horizon Europe. This fund supports military research aimed at advancing EU military capabilities and interoperability—a direct challenge to NATO. Therefore, the UK’s involvement in Horizon Europe indirectly supports the creation of an EU army, which goes against the principles of Brexit.

The Lack of an Exit Strategy:

One significant concern arises from the lack of an exit strategy. Unlike a traditional membership agreement where a nation can choose to leave, the UK’s participation in Horizon Europe binds it to the program. The only way the UK can exit is if the EU decides to expel it, a scenario that seems highly unlikely as the EU benefits from British funding.

The Bigger Picture:

This situation raises questions about the direction the UK is heading. Despite the promises of regaining sovereignty post-Brexit, it appears that the country is being drawn back into the EU’s orbit. The UK is no longer making decisions solely in its national interest but is instead tethered to policies that may not align with its own priorities.

Conclusion:

In summary, the UK’s decision to rejoin the EU scientific research program, Horizon, comes with both potential benefits and significant concerns. While it may offer British scientists access to substantial funding, there are underlying complexities that warrant close examination.

The UK’s return to the Horizon Europe program with a discounted membership fee may seem like a positive development for British scientists. However, the fine print reveals a different story—one where the UK is financially supporting research primarily aligned with EU interests. Moreover, the lack of an exit strategy raises concerns about the UK’s commitment to its post-Brexit course. As the country navigates these intricate agreements, it’s essential for citizens and policymakers to stay informed and scrutinize the details to ensure they align with the nation’s interests and the principles of Brexit.

Key Takeaways:

– The UK agreed to a discounted membership fee for Horizon as part of the post-Brexit trade deal.
– Tensions around the Northern Ireland protocol led to the rejection of the initial agreement, but Britain won’t be charged for the years it was excluded.
– Horizon Europe, on the surface, appears as a collaborative scientific program, but its primary aim is to promote EU policies.
– The EU Commission determines which British research projects align with its interests, raising questions about the UK’s control over its scientific priorities.
– Integration of the European Defense Fund into Horizon Europe indirectly supports the development of an EU army, contrary to Brexit principles.
– There is no clear exit strategy for the UK, making it challenging to disengage from the program if necessary.
– The UK’s participation in Horizon Europe raises concerns about the nation’s sovereignty post-Brexit and its alignment with EU policies.

As the UK continues its involvement in Horizon Europe, it is crucial for both citizens and policymakers to remain vigilant and scrutinize the details to ensure they serve the best interests of the UK and respect the principles of Brexit.

In short, we have been committed to paying the EU £2.6bn per year and we have no way out, well done Mr Sunak!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments